jakov-grobarov

Moj te zivot udario

Ako neces da me shvatis

Jakov Grobarov, 1938. – 27. jul 2013.

* * * *

Ne znam vise granice ludila

moc zivota beskrajno me mami

barustina mi postade idila

uzet vetrom pokorih se tami

Krvopad u mome telu raste

isao bih dalje al me umor steze

istinu mi otpevale laste

pa umorne ruke za lastama beze

Zar se zivot tako bedno izli

ko ratovi puni teskih mana

kurjaci su moje snove grizli

zastava je moja ogolela grana

Nekada sam celivao senku

sto je vece pored reke pravi

sada mrzim i senku i reku

jer mi raste pustinja u glavi

Grudi male a daljina gladna

zahvatila misao mi ludu

pa je vitla dok postane hladna

bezivotno umiruce na sprudu

O dani grozni moji dani

nemojte me vise prepadati

sta mari sto trezan u kafani

zovem majku da mi ime vrati

* * * *
.
Glavni stab beogradske boemije i njihovih pratecih odreda po svu noc je zasedao u podrumu “Presernove kleti.” Jakov Grobarov je najcesce tu izvodio svoje performanse i vec je slovio kao autor slavnog poklica: “Zaustavite pohlepu, hocu da sidjem!” Tom recju se i proslavio i ostvario svoj dar i vise nista nije morao ni da pise ni da govori. (…)
                                                                                                                                              .
Ziveo je javno, na gradskim trgovima se budio i zaspivao, pa ipak kada se planeta zaustavi da i Jakov Grobarov sidje, nece se znati ko je bio i odakle je banuo medju nas ovaj covek, koji nam je ostavio svoje oziljke kao jedine isprave koje je imao. To su oziljci za sva vremena i mi cemo ih lakse tumaciti i bolje razumeti kada im ne bude smetao onaj koji ih je nosio.
                                                                                                                                      .
Matija Beckovic

“I have serious emotional problems. Can you help me?”

.
“You have picked a strange time to ask. I am in the middle of a suicide.”

“Kao vojnik stranke, necu odbiti nijedno zaduzenje, pa ni ministarsko.”

Bratislav Gasic, potpredsednik SNS, na pitanje da li ce on biti jedan od novih ministara u rekonstruisanoj vladi, B92

seldzuk – prostak, primitivac, provincijalac

seljobus – prigradski autobus

nosferatu – osoba sa velikim nosem, v. sirano, surlas

panonka – zena sa malim grudima

stomaklija – trudnica

kenjigrad – Beograd

crvene brigade – menstruacija

mikseta – devojka koja cesto menja partnere

preci – roditelji

potomci – deca

kulijana – dobro raspolozenje, opustanje, opustenost, spokojnost, bezbriznost

kulje – bolje

knjiga strave – skolski dnevnik

njakvas – osoba koja pije njakvi (vinjak)

sutlija – sperma

taktika – sat, casovnik

lufthanza, dati mu po lufthanzi – provetriti

carobni breg – zenski polni organ, v. grm, zbun, ckapi

smrad – los covek, nitkov, nistarija, gmaz

Borivoj Gerzic – Recnik beogradskog zargona

Imao je 6 godina kad je otkrio tajnu:

Znas sta sam ja otkrio? Da ja nisam dete. Ja jesam mali, ali nisam detinjast. Ja razumem ono sto je zivot. Tu sam veliki, sve gde god je ozbiljno i vazno. A sve gde je igra, tu sam dete. 

Znas, mama, retki su ovakvi ljudi kao sto smo ti i ja. 

Svako ima svoj put. Na kraju puta ima nesto lepo ili ruzno. Nesto se desava. Mi moramo to da otkrijemo sto brze. Treba da trcimo. Ja sam radoznao jer zivot nam prolazi. Posebno ti treba da trcis. Ti staris. Imas 33 godine, a ja sam jos mali. 

Sad shvatam. Muz i zena ne mogu biti razliciti. Moraju biti isti. Ne moze jedan biti obican, a drugi neobican. Da li mogu biti muz i zena krava i lisica? Ljudi su kao zivotinje, samo malo drugaciji.

Zato sto govore. 

Kad si na jednom putu, ti na drugi ne mozes. Izabrao si taj, zato moras dobro da izaberes. Imas dosta vremena za biranje. Moras da se potrudis da izaberes dobar. Los put je da izaberes da budes obican. 

PRVA PLATA

U supermarketu mala plata

Petnaest hiljada

Ona mlada

Zeljna zivota

Zeljna grada

Nema ni za pljuge

Pusi onu krdzu

Dve hiljade i sto mesecno

Ostane dvanaest i devetsto

Pet hiljada da na prevoz

Od Dolova do Panceva

Naravno da uvek kuci vecera

Ostane sedam i devetsto

Jede onako minimalno

Za sto dinara u gradu

dvadesetpet radnih dana

Dve i po hiljade ode

Na losu hranu

Pet i cetiristo

Ostane joj cisto

Svako jutro budilnik u pet

Ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti

Pa autobus

Klaj klaj klaj

Kad je primila prvu platu

Dodje da obraduje tatu

A on joj cestita

Pa je pita

Sta ce da placa od racuna

Kuca je dugova puna

Smatra se da je Hitler imao hipnoticku moc nad masama. Staljin se pred masama uopste i nije pojavljivao i retko je javno nastupao, a njegova “hipnoticka moc” ni u kom slucaju nije bila manja. Tu nije stvar u nekoj licnoj sposobnosti vodje vec u samoj masi, u njenoj sposobnosti, u datoj situaciji, za “samohipnozu”. Ako je masa izabrala nekoga za “hipnotizera”, ovaj moze da cini bilo sta – da govori, cuti, vice, sapuce, da vrska, govori s akcentom… i sve ce imati efekta. Tek post factum izgleda kao da se izabranik sam probio “u vrh” i zaveo mase. U stvari, same mu mase dodeljuju ovu ulogu i prinudjuju ga da igra istorijsku ulogu. Upravo ulogu. Upravo da igra. On postaje adekvatan masi koja ga je izabrala. Staljin je bio ovaploceno “MI”.

Postoje neka opsta pravila po kojima se ljudi izdvajaju za vodje. Jedno od tih pravila na prvi pogled izgleda fiktivno. Ali ono je u najvecoj meri delotvorno. To je prezir prema ljudima. Staljin je od samog pocetka znao cenu ljudi, znao je kakvo je to smece – narodne mase, znao je da su price o visokom nivou svesti kao uslovu za komunizam susta besmislica. Staljin se ponasao prema ljudima u skladu s njihovom realnom vrednoscu. Njegove su mu represalije donele vise harizmatskog obozavanja nego beznacajna godisnja smanjenja cena namirnica. Staljin je znao ko smo mi, a mi smo znali da on to zna. U dubini duse priznavali smo da je sve sto se dogadjalo primereno nasoj ljudskoj prirodi. Cudno, ali to je bio najsnazniji izraz nase teznje da se uzdignemo do bozanskog nivoa. Bili smo bogovi u svom nistavilu. Ukoliko nadjes objasnjenje za ovu cinjenicu, razumeces i sve ostalo.

Aleksandar Zinovjev, Polet nase mladosti, Prosveta

Nemaju samo učenici problem sa razumevanjem složenih iskaza, dužih tekstova i shvatanjem ideja i argumenata. Slične probleme ima i dobar deo njihovih nastavnika koji su se i sami obrazovali u jednom neefikasnom sistemu koji je ignorisao funkcionalno znanje i logičke sposobnosti. Testovi sa poznatim pitanjima su bili katastrofalni populistički ustupak činjenici da učenicima celokupno bazično osnovno obrazovanje nije dovoljno da se suoče sa ozbiljnom proverom stečenog, ali ne i ‘obrađenog’ znanja. Što se tiče odgovornosti, nemam mnogo toga da dodam. Problem Žarka Obradovića i ekipe oko njega jeste u tome da ne priznaju svoju odgovornost za stanje u sektoru, dakle za nečinjenje u situaciji kada su mnogo toga morali da učine. Mislim da kompletna ekipa koja se poslednjih nekoliko godina bavila osnovnim i srednjim obrazovanjem, inspekcijom škola i razvojem sistema obrazovanja mora da ode bez obzira na to čiji su partijski pripadnici, kafanski ili porodični prijatelji ili rođaci. Sa punom odgovornošću tvrdim da je to jedna mračna skupina ekstremno nesposobnih ljudi i da će se razmere štete koju su načinili tek videti.

                                                                                                                                                 .

Vigor Majic, direktor Petnice, NIN

Presao iz URS-a u SNS da ne bi morao da ide na koncert Djordja Davida

Clan Opstinskog odbora Ujedinjenih regiona Srbije u Ljuboviji Nikola Papkovic presao je iz ove stranke u Srpsku naprednu stranku kako ne bi morao da postupi po nalogu vrha stranke da prisustvuje koncertu Djordja Davida i njegovog benda “Death saw” u tom mestu.

“Svasta sam morao da radim po nalogu partije do sada, ali neke granice ipak postoje”, kratko je izjavio sada vec bivsi clan URS-a Papkovic.

Njuz.net, 20. jul

I am honored to be with you today at your commencement from one of the finest universities in the world. I never graduated from college. Truth be told, this is the closest I’ve ever gotten to a college graduation. Today I want to tell you three stories from my life. That’s it. No big deal. Just three stories.

The first story is about connecting the dots.

I dropped out of Reed College after the first 6 months, but then stayed around as a drop-in for another 18 months or so before I really quit. So why did I drop out?

It started before I was born. My biological mother was a young, unwed college graduate student, and she decided to put me up for adoption. She felt very strongly that I should be adopted by college graduates, so everything was all set for me to be adopted at birth by a lawyer and his wife. Except that when I popped out they decided at the last minute that they really wanted a girl. So my parents, who were on a waiting list, got a call in the middle of the night asking: “We have an unexpected baby boy; do you want him?” They said: “Of course.” My biological mother later found out that my mother had never graduated from college and that my father had never graduated from high school. She refused to sign the final adoption papers. She only relented a few months later when my parents promised that I would someday go to college.

And 17 years later I did go to college. But I naively chose a college that was almost as expensive as Stanford, and all of my working-class parents’ savings were being spent on my college tuition. After six months, I couldn’t see the value in it. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life and no idea how college was going to help me figure it out. And here I was spending all of the money my parents had saved their entire life. So I decided to drop out and trust that it would all work out OK. It was pretty scary at the time, but looking back it was one of the best decisions I ever made. The minute I dropped out I could stop taking the required classes that didn’t interest me, and begin dropping in on the ones that looked interesting.

It wasn’t all romantic. I didn’t have a dorm room, so I slept on the floor in friends’ rooms, I returned coke bottles for the 5¢ deposits to buy food with, and I would walk the 7 miles across town every Sunday night to get one good meal a week at the Hare Krishna temple. I loved it. And much of what I stumbled into by following my curiosity and intuition turned out to be priceless later on. Let me give you one example:

Reed College at that time offered perhaps the best calligraphy instruction in the country. Throughout the campus every poster, every label on every drawer, was beautifully hand calligraphed. Because I had dropped out and didn’t have to take the normal classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do this. I learned about serif and san serif typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter combinations, about what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can’t capture, and I found it fascinating.

None of this had even a hope of any practical application in my life. But ten years later, when we were designing the first Macintosh computer, it all came back to me. And we designed it all into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography. If I had never dropped in on that single course in college, the Mac would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced fonts. And since Windows just copied the Mac, it’s likely that no personal computer would have them. If I had never dropped out, I would have never dropped in on this calligraphy class, and personal computers might not have the wonderful typography that they do. Of course it was impossible to connect the dots looking forward when I was in college. But it was very, very clear looking backwards ten years later.

Again, you can’t connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something — your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.

My second story is about love and loss.

I was lucky — I found what I loved to do early in life. Woz and I started Apple in my parents garage when I was 20. We worked hard, and in 10 years Apple had grown from just the two of us in a garage into a $2 billion company with over 4000 employees. We had just released our finest creation — the Macintosh — a year earlier, and I had just turned 30. And then I got fired. How can you get fired from a company you started? Well, as Apple grew we hired someone who I thought was very talented to run the company with me, and for the first year or so things went well. But then our visions of the future began to diverge and eventually we had a falling out. When we did, our Board of Directors sided with him. So at 30 I was out. And very publicly out. What had been the focus of my entire adult life was gone, and it was devastating.

I really didn’t know what to do for a few months. I felt that I had let the previous generation of entrepreneurs down – that I had dropped the baton as it was being passed to me. I met with David Packard and Bob Noyce and tried to apologize for screwing up so badly. I was a very public failure, and I even thought about running away from the valley. But something slowly began to dawn on me — I still loved what I did. The turn of events at Apple had not changed that one bit. I had been rejected, but I was still in love. And so I decided to start over.

I didn’t see it then, but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again, less sure about everything. It freed me to enter one of the most creative periods of my life.

During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the worlds first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple’s current renaissance. And Laurene and I have a wonderful family together.

I’m pretty sure none of this would have happened if I hadn’t been fired from Apple. It was awful tasting medicine, but I guess the patient needed it. Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don’t lose faith. I’m convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You’ve got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle. As with all matters of the heart, you’ll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking until you find it. Don’t settle.

My third story is about death.

When I was 17, I read a quote that went something like: “If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you’ll most certainly be right.” It made an impression on me, and since then, for the past 33 years, I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself: “If today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?” And whenever the answer has been “No” for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something.

Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure – these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.

About a year ago I was diagnosed with cancer. I had a scan at 7:30 in the morning, and it clearly showed a tumor on my pancreas. I didn’t even know what a pancreas was. The doctors told me this was almost certainly a type of cancer that is incurable, and that I should expect to live no longer than three to six months. My doctor advised me to go home and get my affairs in order, which is doctor’s code for prepare to die. It means to try to tell your kids everything you thought you’d have the next 10 years to tell them in just a few months. It means to make sure everything is buttoned up so that it will be as easy as possible for your family. It means to say your goodbyes.

I lived with that diagnosis all day. Later that evening I had a biopsy, where they stuck an endoscope down my throat, through my stomach and into my intestines, put a needle into my pancreas and got a few cells from the tumor. I was sedated, but my wife, who was there, told me that when they viewed the cells under a microscope the doctors started crying because it turned out to be a very rare form of pancreatic cancer that is curable with surgery. I had the surgery and I’m fine now.

This was the closest I’ve been to facing death, and I hope it’s the closest I get for a few more decades. Having lived through it, I can now say this to you with a bit more certainty than when death was a useful but purely intellectual concept:

No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.

Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.

When I was young, there was an amazing publication called The Whole Earth Catalog, which was one of the bibles of my generation. It was created by a fellow named Stewart Brand not far from here in Menlo Park, and he brought it to life with his poetic touch. This was in the late 1960’s, before personal computers and desktop publishing, so it was all made with typewriters, scissors, and polaroid cameras. It was sort of like Google in paperback form, 35 years before Google came along: it was idealistic, and overflowing with neat tools and great notions.

Stewart and his team put out several issues of The Whole Earth Catalog, and then when it had run its course, they put out a final issue. It was the mid-1970s, and I was your age. On the back cover of their final issue was a photograph of an early morning country road, the kind you might find yourself hitchhiking on if you were so adventurous. Beneath it were the words: “Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.” It was their farewell message as they signed off. Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish. And I have always wished that for myself. And now, as you graduate to begin anew, I wish that for you.

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.

Thank you all very much.

Text of the Commencement address delivered by

Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer and of Pixar Animation Studios,

on June 12, 2005.

Dojučerašnji prvi žandar Srbije, na vest o smeni, zavapio je: “Građani Srbije, braćo i sestre, očigledno je da nekome smeta moj starosrpski način ophođenja i moje izjašnjavanje kao Srbina u svojoj i našoj zemlji Srbiji. Doći će vreme kada će se i to promeniti.” To je izjavio Bratislav Dikić za B92 i automatski se kandidovao za eksponat u Etnološkom muzeju.

Tu bi mogao da demonstrira “starosrpski način ophođenja”, ma šta to značilo. Već samom tom izjavom narečeni se preporučio za Noć muzeja gde bi jednom godišnje demonstrirao takvo ophođenje. S vrata bi još, u zavisnosti od situacije, govorio “Ljubim ruku, gospođo” ili “Gde se guraš, marvo”, a u praktičnom delu programa mogao bi vaspitno da raspali ponekog po turu.

Drugo nešto, međutim, zanimljivije je od “starosrpskog ophođenja”. To je uobrazilja svakog ko se dočepa vlasti, makar bila i žandarska, a svaka je pomalo takva, da je postao neka vrsta oca nacije, pa nam se i Dikić obraća retorikom kojom se javnost obaveštava o početku rata, državnog udara ili neke druge opšte nesreće. Šta mu znači ono: “Građani Srbije, braćo i sestre?” Ta patetika plaćenog činovnika jednog ministarstva govori o veri te vrste ljudi da kad se dočepaju neke sile misle da su bogomdani i da sa njihovom smenom počinje i smak sveta, mada Dikić, sudeći po izjavi, veruje da će “doći vreme kada će se i to promeniti” pa će žandari biti nesmenjivi, ukoliko vole Srbiju, ma šta Srbija mislila o njima.

*  *  *

Povodom moje prošlonedeljne kolumne, dela koji se odnosi na nasušnu potrebu srpskih privrednika da s Bogom sklapaju rezervni strateški plan, javio mi se čitalac koji me je upozorio da sam izostavio važan deo saopštenja o poseti patrijarha Irineja srpskom Poslovnom klubu “Privrednik.”

Tačno je i evo dopune saopštenja: “Njegova svetost patrijarh srpski gospodin Irinej se podsetio i na značajnu pomoć koju su kompanije članova Kluba pružile u akciji prikupljanja pomoći za obnovu Hilandara 2004, kao i na doprinos članova Kluba radu Skupštine Društva za podizanje Hrama Svetog Save, u kome aktivnu ulogu imaju gospoda Miodrag Babić, Miodrag Kostić, Slobodan Petrović, Dušan Stupar, Milan Beko, Zoran Drakulić, Milija Babović, Obrad Sikimić i Ilija Šetka.”

Zašto je ovaj deo saopštenja važan. Zato što je izostavljen Miroslav Mišković, najveći pojedinačni donator Srpske pravoslavne crkve i inicijator Društva za podizanje Hrama Svetog Save.

Čitalac me pita: Nije li to licemerje i bezobrazluk? Eh, gospodine moj, mislim se, kad bi barem jednom bili u prilici da Boga koji sve vidi pozovemo za očevica, makar kao “zaštićenog svedoka”, sve bi bilo jasnije.

Dragoljub Zarkovic, Vreme, 18. jul

AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

4th Amendment of the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights

THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Passed by Congress September 25, 1789

Ratified December 15, 1791

I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

II

A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In an article published in several European newspapers, the WikiLeaks founder and the Director General of Reporters Without Borders call on European states grant asylum the whistleblower who exposed the NSA eavesdropping, for the sake of freedom of the press and of information.
.
.

On 12 October 2012, the European Union won the Nobel Peace Prize for contributing to the “advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe”. The EU should show itself worthy of this honour and show its will to defend freedom of information, regardless of fear of political pressure from its so-called closest ally, the United States.

Now that Edward Snowden, the young American who revealed the global monitoring system known as Prism, has requested asylum from 20 countries, the EU nations should extend a welcome, under whatever law or status seems most appropriate.

Although the United States remains a world leader in upholding the ideal of freedom of expression, the American attitude toward whistleblowers sullies the first amendment of the US constitution.

In 2004, the UN special rapporteur for freedom of expression, as well as his counterparts in the Organisation of American States and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe issued a joint call to all governments to protect whistleblowers from all “legal, administrative or employment-related sanctions if they act in ‘good faith'”. Whistleblowers were defined as “individuals releasing confidential or secret information although they are under an official or other obligation to maintain confidentiality or secrecy”.

More recently, the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe resolved in 2010 that “the definition of protected disclosures shall include all bona fide warnings against various types of unlawful acts”. The assembly’s resolution 1729 concluded that member countries’ laws “should therefore cover both public and private sector whistle-blowers, including members of the armed forces and special services”.

Traitor or whistleblower?

Some are calling for a manhunt for Snowden on the grounds that he is a traitor, and others are trying to cloak the issues he raised in legalistic complexities. But what serious person can deny that Edward Snowden is a whistleblower?

The digital communications specialist’s revelations have enabled the international press, including The Washington PostThe Guardian and Der Spiegel, to shine a light on a surveillance system that tracks tens of millions of citizens, Europeans among them.

Targeted by an apparatus that threatens their sovereignty as well as their principles, the EU countries owe Snowden a debt of gratitude for his revelations, which were clearly in the public interest.

This young man will remain abandoned in the transit zone of the Moscow airport only if the European countries abandon their principles, as well as a major part of the raison d’etre of the EU. Expressions of diplomatic outrage will be empty gestures if the person responsible for the revelations is left isolated and abandoned.

Beyond the necessity of providing a legal shield for whistleblowers, the protection of privacy is a matter of clear public interest, especially in the realm of freedom of information. Frank La Rue, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, noted in a report last June that “arbitrary and unlawful infringements of the right to privacy … threaten the protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression”.

The confidentiality of written and oral exchanges is essential to ensuring the exercise of freedom of information. But when journalists’ sources are compromised, as happened in the case of the Associated Press; when the United States abuses the Espionage Act, a 1917 law that has been invoked a total of nine times against whistleblowers, six of these cases under the Obama administration; when the government tries to silence WikiLeaks by imposing a financial embargo on the organisation and by subjecting associates and friends of Julian Assange to abusive searches when they enter the United States, when the site’s founder and his colleagues are threatened with US prosecution, more than American democracy is threatened.

Indeed, the very model of democracy that the heirs of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin are responsible for upholding has been robbed of its essence.

Only eloquent words?

By what right is the United States exempt from principles that it demands be applied elsewhere?

In January 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a historic speech in which she defined freedom of expression as a cornerstone of American diplomacy. She reiterated that position in February 2011 inanother speech in which she said that “on the spectrum of internet freedom, we place ourselves on the side of openness.”

Eloquent words. They may have brought encouragement to dissidents in Tehran, Beijing, Havana, Asmara, Ashgabat, Moscow and so many other capitals. But how disappointing to find that the skyscrapers of American surveillance have reached a size to match China’s technological Great Wall.

The White House and State Department message of democracy and defence of human rights has lost considerable credibility. One sign of widespread concern – Amazon has reported a 6,000 per cent increase in sales of the George Orwell classic, 1984.

Now, with Big Brother watching us from a Washington suburb, the key institutions of American democracy must play their assigned roles of counterweight to the executive branch and its abuses. The system of checks and balances is more than a slogan for avid readers of Tocqueville and Montesquieu.

American leaders should realise the glaring contradiction between their soaring odes to freedom and the realities of official actions, which damage the image of their country.

Members of Congress must be capable of holding back the tide of security provisions of the Patriot Act by recognising the legitimate rights of men and women who sound the alarm.

The Whistleblower Protection Act must be amended to ensure effective protection for whistleblowers who act in the public interest – an interest completely separate from immediate national concerns as intelligence services interpret them.

Press Europ / Le Monde, July 5th